Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and debateable presumptions:
1) That the price of decay happens to be constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances when you look at the specimen dated haven’t been modified during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that whenever the rock first formed it included an understood amount of child product (“Radioisotopes in addition to chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)
We should observe that past processes may never be occurring at all today, and that some could have occurred at prices and intensities far distinctive from comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)
Jesus cursed the floor (the stones too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed could be the ground for the benefit”
When this took place there is a burst of radioactity that made the stones look over the age of they certainly were.
Would not this make all of the stones look the age that is same?
“The stone real question is fairly easy and it has related to the fundamental elements which composed these stones at first. Whenever all these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it could simply be normal to allow them to act relating to their specific properties, ultimately acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices. Nastavi čitati “Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and debateable presumptions:”